Wednesday, July 31, 2013
Teen Wolf Gets Better With Age- More, I Say!
Three seasons in, and the MTV reboot of the Michael J. Fox movie has finally won me over.
I've been watching the show kind of listlessly for a while, drifting away after a few episodes, only to drift back when I catch sight of a promo.
The first season wasn't that great, but to be honest, nowhere near as bad as it could have been. The main problem? The show's leads (which I think I've mentioned before), who weren't charismatic enough to carry the program's Romeo/Juliet premise.
Every now and again though, the stylised darkness really worked. Borderline cinematic in scope, actually.
Once season two got kicking, sub-plots started hatching left, right and centre. MTV called in a stream of solid talent, while also allowing minor characters more screen time. The cinematography and editing, already pretty top notch, got better and better with each episode. Dark, moody, with occasional scenes thrust into the daylight.
Now, well into season three, there's no denying the show's established a serious sense of STYLE. It's not just faux-edgy anymore. Teen Wolf is confident in ways only a well crafted vehicle can be. Nobody's dipping their toes in the water... everyone, onscreen and off, is diving right in.
Episode eight of season three, especially, showed a willingness to explore/play/utterly screw around with standard linear narrative. Jarring, if not downright confusing, a style of structural experimentation not often seen in teen television. (Kudos to the network for loosening the reins on that one.)
Why is the show working so well right now? I've got a few ideas that all equal a whole lot of MORE.
The scripting is moving more quickly, the narrative more dense. The violence is more immediate because it feels like it always impacts on the storyline of a main character in some way, so there's more empathy evoked in the viewers. Think more shifting of alliances (a show's always more interesting when "goodies" and "baddies" are written with more complex nuances). Overall, there's more confidence, in the sense the production is taking more risks, the majority of which are working.
Less pretty characters who happen to be portrayed by better actors are garnering more screen time. More romantic potential is blooming, that more often than not, doesn't work out, adding to the potent mix of chemistry/history (making shared screen time between two characters more interesting every time).
Say hello to more kinds of supernatural beings onscreen. (Hey, the more, the merrier. Just no dryads. True Blood STILL hasn't recovered from that early plot monstrosity.) We see more kinds of relationships (ie siblings) explored in more complex ways. Not to mention more exploration of the concept of leadership and how it interacts with individuality.
The adults have been incorporated more readily into the narratives, which lifts it out of the "teen-show-with-clueless-authority-figures" category. (Making parents idiotic is the downfall of many a teen show. Supposedly appealing to the youth market, but I'm not sure if this approach holds true in the longterm, because over time it tends to damage the quality of the show, ie parentals stand out as poorly developed rather than deliberately flat.)
Oh, also, female characters get more screen time en masse and more power (in terms of supernatural skill sets, I mean. Trust me, that's the only way to stay alive on this show). There's also more humour, woven adroitly through more intense scenarios, which I always like because it makes me think of Buffy.
I've never been a fan of the idea that shows can "grow" over time, it always sounds quite naff, but I think Teen Wolf actually has grown past its predecessor, and is in the act of creating its own (entertainment?) identity.
Overall, there's just a whole lot more happening. Need I say more? (Maybe one more time... 'cause that's not annoying.)
Tempted to finish with some "if you don't agree, bite me" humour, but that's too tacky. Masterful Restraint, Table For One.
Friday, May 17, 2013
CW Goes Scifi
The American network known for it's 18-34 market focus isn't going to rest on its supernatural laurels (ie The Vampire Diaries, Supernatural). Mid-season has a surprisingly futuristic/science fiction slant, thanks to new shows The 100, Star-Crossed, and The Tomorrow People.
Why Did I Watch That Other Trailer?? Or more importantly, what was the network thinking?! This trailer looks like it's for a different series. Starts with cool shots in space, has some scary Orwellian inferences, and gets all Survivor. We barely see the annoying actress who dominated screen time in the other trailer.
There's more of a sense of story here. I like the lead, she's convincingly emotive. Plus, this offering makes it more obvious the creepy kid who plays the young terrorist in Continuum also stars! And the dumped boyfriend from Suburbia's also in the mix.
Star-Crossed
The Originals
Last season CW paid tribute to the superhero revival with Arrow. While many thought this season would be all about Hunger Games spin-offs, more superheroes, and maybe a zombie effort, the network has surprisingly bucked expected trends, choosing to run with teen scifi instead.
I, for one, am celebrating, following the scifi fiasco that is Defiance. (Thank God for quality like Continuum). And yes, while CW shows are slightly "younger" in demographic, and occasionally less than challenging, in terms of narrative... it doesn't mean some standout writing won't slip into the mix. (Hey, I'm a mid-season optimist.) Scifi all the way x
The Tomorrow People
Have I seen This Before? Yes, it's a remake of a British show from way back when, aka the seventies. (Olden days for today's teens.)
Basically, it's a little bit Heroes/Alphas, a touch of Jumper, also that character from X-Men who teleports (can't remember his name), a dash of the movie Dakota Fanning was in which nobody liked but me (Push), and about a dozen other films/books/comic/television shows... Repetitive? Sure, but hello, mutants are a never-ending fount of fascinating possibilities.
Notable Cast Includes: Mark Pellegrino, who played Lucifer in Supernatural. Plus there's an Asian character in the teen super-talent cliche who hopefully will not die immediately. CW also keeps it in the family with lead Robbie Amell, cousin of Arrow's Stephen Amell.
So What's The Story? In the future (love typing that) one hundred juvenile delinquents have been sent back to a possibly-still-toxic-post-nuclear-conflict Earth. Personally, I find the juvenile delinquent sell quite tacky. Can't they just be teens sent back to Earth? Does it have to be emphasised they're Rebel Without A Cause types who have problems with cruel author-it-eys? Sigh.
Why The Premise Is Solid: Dystopian tales leave themselves open to a lot of survival/self-discovery arcs. The sets are also cheap, because mostly, you just need some fake ruins and a forest. This is the kind of show that relies on the narrative. (Fingers crossed.)
Not A Stellar Preview. This trailer involves a heap of kids in a large metal bin, that when opened, shows a forest. Totally lacking pizazz. Minimalist scifi scenarios need a combination of striking camerawork, lighting, editing, brilliant acting, stunning music, riveting dialogue... something to sell it. I'll watch the show despite the trailer, which is a bit of a marketing fail.
The 100 (Another Trailer Online and My Reactions)
Why Did I Watch That Other Trailer?? Or more importantly, what was the network thinking?! This trailer looks like it's for a different series. Starts with cool shots in space, has some scary Orwellian inferences, and gets all Survivor. We barely see the annoying actress who dominated screen time in the other trailer.
There's more of a sense of story here. I like the lead, she's convincingly emotive. Plus, this offering makes it more obvious the creepy kid who plays the young terrorist in Continuum also stars! And the dumped boyfriend from Suburbia's also in the mix.
Only Dodgy Moments: The obligatory ass-and-tits shots of a teen girl... yes, the nubile hottie gets her kit off, sigh. I also get kind of weird about dystopian prison environments where women somehow still manage to procure, and apply, impressive eyeliner (check the 30 second mark). But hey, I guess this is the survival of civilisation we're talking about, right? O_O
Star-Crossed
I'm Just Gonna Say It: Online this clip is garnering the most criticism because it's generally considered cool to sneer at teen romance. I'm happy to admit I'll be a sucker for this one, because I was a sucker for Roswell! Teen romance at it's sweetest, with the ultimate outsider (and no, I don't mean a vampire).
Unlike Roswell, in this aliens-at-a-high-school series, the aliens are out of the closet (so to speak), but alien-a-phobia seems to be running high. Basically, these kids from another planet are the ultimate refugees, having spent a decade interned in camps.
Why I Like The Idea: Alien tv storylines are out of this world (had to do it). I've enjoyed aspects of many, from childhood exposure to The Powers of Matthew Star and the original V, not to mention Alien Nation (best theme music ever), the slightly saccharine Roswell, and the darker Invasion. I think the idea of aliens appeals to my inner anthropologist.
Nice Production Values. In this clip, I like the way it's filmed, all sun soaked and kind of dusty (nice lens), I love the almost jagged camera work, the use of slow motion and some wide frames. I like the editing. Oh, and I love the aliens' tatts. I also respect that the actress made an impact with only one line to deliver, and there's no denying lead Matt Lanter's great onscreen.
SO, OKAY, THIS ONE ISN'T SCIFI, BUT STILL...
The Originals
"Welcome to the dark side of New Orleans, where the living are easily lost, and the dead stick around to play."
Why I'm Sneaking This In To A Scifi Story: Because it's also on the network's mid-season list and I'm going to watch it. Reason enough.
What's It About? CW keeps one foot in the (bloody) vampire pool with The Originals, a spin-off from The Vampire Diaries that looks like it might out-rate its predecessor. (That's awkward.)
Best Selling Point: The Originals isn't hampered by a high school link-up, because these vamps left teen angst behind long ago. Setting the series in New Orleans invariably makes me think of Anne Rice's iconic crew of glamorous undead, and I'm guessing I'm not the only one. The Originals should be interesting, partly because the writing can take a more adult direction, and partly because it's shot in New Orleans; the vibrant location is bound to become an extra character in and of itself.
Best Selling Point: The Originals isn't hampered by a high school link-up, because these vamps left teen angst behind long ago. Setting the series in New Orleans invariably makes me think of Anne Rice's iconic crew of glamorous undead, and I'm guessing I'm not the only one. The Originals should be interesting, partly because the writing can take a more adult direction, and partly because it's shot in New Orleans; the vibrant location is bound to become an extra character in and of itself.
Truth is, Klaus, Elijah and Rebekah are three fan favourites on The Vampire Diaries. The first of the vampires? The strongest? The original family with issues? How can teen storylines compete with that? I think The Originals is going to be kick-ass.
Labels:
Star-Crossed,
The 100,
The Originals,
The Tomorrow People
Monday, April 29, 2013
Twisted Teen Thriller
Tv shows about teen psychos are all the rage right now (Did you see what I did there?). Bates Motel focuses on the formative years of Norman Bates (yes, the character from Psycho), but personally, I'm more interested in Twisted, a tamer take (I need to stop doing this) on the subject of young sociopaths.
ABC Family ran the first episode of Twisted in March as a preview to the show's June release. The concept is tre unexpected for the network and there was a period where the series seemed uncertain for pick up, given events in the US at the time. While murder mysteries are the network's style, they don't generally opt for programs that have such potentially disturbing core material, with a primarily teen target audience.
(Note: I think the promo's weak, considering how surprisingly intriguing the episode was.)
Twisted kickstarts with a slightly saturated flashback scene including a swing set (cue recognised television symbol for innocence/childhood). Two eleven year old girls are talking about their friend Danny, who's been acting strangely.
Danny emerges from the house carrying a red skipping rope. Turns out he then confesses to murdering his aunt whose corpse is inside (she was babysitting). Not a casual opener for what is ostensibly a teen drama...!
Now sixteen, Danny's returning to school, fully rehabilitated (in theory), and determined to reconnect with his two best friends. They're both harbouring a boatload of issues as a result of what happened back in the day, and are none too happy to see old Danny Boy.
Initially.
Turns out, teen Danny is determined, confident and charismatic. By the end of the episode, each girl is bonding with him, albeit reluctantly. We think we know where the story's going now (in broad terms)...
...until a classmate is murdered. Either Danny's back to bad habits, or someone's setting him up. Say hello to the season's narrative arc.
...until a classmate is murdered. Either Danny's back to bad habits, or someone's setting him up. Say hello to the season's narrative arc.
The genius aspect here is that the premise allows leeway for moments of awkwardness in the pilot. What would a teenage girl say to a childhood friend slash murderer? The whole scenario is so brutally uncomfortable for all the characters involved, that it excuses moments of clunky dialogue or the occasional wooden performance.
Even better, by writing the two best friends as girls who've since had a falling out, there's a neat love triangle already set in place for the show's hero(?).
While watching the pilot, I assumed Danny's innocence for a few reasons. He won't talk about what happened that fateful day (love that phrase), which to me implies some kind of conspiracy (keeping in mind this is the channel responsible for Pretty Little Liars and the unsolved murder at the core of that show has kept it on air for four years). Also, this isn't HBO, so if he is a budding sociopath, ABC Family are pretty far off their usual content course. Finally, Danny is written rather sympathetically.
(And yes, before you ask, everyone's good-looking and full of sassy, referential teen dialogue, because hello, ABC Family).
Still, there's enough elements in the pilot to keep the viewer uncomfortably aware of the possibility Danny might be guilty of murder. There's something detached and slightly calculating about the character. You're hoping because as a victim he's had to learn to disconnect to survive, and not because as a killer, he's watching, planning, and working to stay a step ahead...!
There's something's odd about Danny, and the murder of his aunt is never far from the characters' (or viewers'), minds. It's like you can never quite relax into the story while you're watching it, because you're just not sure about this kid.
I think actor Avan Jogia's experience on the Nickelodeon series Victorious has paid off because while he's obviously capable of acting troubled and dark (Ben the bomber in the opening episode of Caprica), he can also turn on the smooth friendliness that's de rigeur for tween/teen shows, which comes across as borderline chilling in such an emotionally complex scenario.
I think actor Avan Jogia's experience on the Nickelodeon series Victorious has paid off because while he's obviously capable of acting troubled and dark (Ben the bomber in the opening episode of Caprica), he can also turn on the smooth friendliness that's de rigeur for tween/teen shows, which comes across as borderline chilling in such an emotionally complex scenario.
The pacing's interesting, the pilot moving very briskly through the set-up. You start in the past, move to the present, and from then on you're walked through (jogged through?) moments in the school hallway, a teen party, interactions in the car, a cafe, there's a murder, post-murder, a school assembly, the sheriff's interrogation, a few home time interactions with parents... Basically a flood of character introductions and developments. I wonder if these short scenes are a stylistic response to reduced teen attention spans?
Like most modern shows aimed at the youth market, the parents are all a bit weird (read lame), but I definitely liked the adult casting here, including Kathy Najimy as a teacher. (Though I wonder, do they really teach Psychology in US high schools?)
Will definitely watch on to see how the story unfolds...
Will definitely watch on to see how the story unfolds...
And yes, I won't lie, the skipping rope opening credits freak me out a tad.
Friday, March 22, 2013
Dirty Dozen (Veronica Mars Style)
Looks like the cool kids from Neptune High are back. On the big screen this time!* (I'd make an "out of this world" pun, but I'm saving that for the Roswell reunion).
*For anyone who missed the news, show creator Rob Thomas is making a Veronica Mars movie. HUZZAH.
There's no denying Veronica Mars had some of the hottest bit parters, guest stars and cameos in town. (Remarkable really, considering the show only ran for three seasons.) The big question is, who to invite back for the party? Here's the dozen faces I'd love to see pop up at the ten year reunion:
JOSS WHEDON
CHARISMA CARPENTER
ALYSON HANNIGAN
Obviously Buffy's creator and Veronica Mars' creator were mutual fans, what with Buffy alumni coming out of the woodwork. The good news is, Alison Hannigan played the loopy sister of Veronica Mars' main squeeze Logan, making it way easy to include her in the movie storyline. Woohoo!
NELSAN ELLIS
Yes, the actor who plays flamboyantly loveable Lafayette in True Blood appeared in VM too. (Seriously, at this point is there an actor who doesn't have this show on their CV?) Nelsan Ellis was brilliant as Apollo, a former Ugandan child soldier. Granted, he's from the college year of the show, but for Nelsan I'd take an implausible plot point any day.
AARON ASHMORE
Ah, Troy. The charming but dodgy drug dealer boyfriend from the show's first year, who Veronica later ran into at college. Despite some trust issues, she helped clear his name when he was falsely accused of rape. Also, the Ashmore brothers rule. Maybe Troy could be Madison's present-day hubbie, as penance for past sins?
KRYSTEN RITTER
PAUL RUDD
Rudd embodied a burnt out muso for one episode during Veronica's year at university, where a run-in with Veronica and Piz helped him get his life back on track. The character could easily be written back in, especially if he played a set at the school reunion. What are friends for, right?
JANE LYNCH
Before she was a bitch on Glee, Lynch played a mean teacher on Veronica Mars (minus the humour). If she rocks up at the school reunion, Thomas should write her a little funnier and slightly less distasteful this time around. Even better, she could pop up onscreen wearing a Sue Syvlester-style tracksuit... How meta.
LEIGHTON MEESTER
Gossip Girl's over, meaning Leighton's got some spare time. Plus, in real life she's dating Adam Brody (aka Seth Cohen from The O.C.). Adding the Veronica Mars movie to her pop culture CV would just rule at this point. WE LOVE YOU LEIGHTON.
SYDNEY TAMIIA POITIER
Sydney Poitier's daughter was my fave out of all the teachers at Neptune High. I'm not sure why she stopped appearing in the show? In one episode Veronica explains her character's absence as the result of an accidental pregnancy. Here's hoping she decides to rock up at the reunion, for old times sake.
SAM HUNTINGTON
I really like Sammy boy in Being Human. On Veronica Mars, he played spoilt rich kid Luke. He's alumni, so it would be easy-peasy for him to saunter into the reunion. Luke might not be as memorable a character as Dick or Madison, but I for one would enjoy seeing him in the mix.
JESSICA CHASTAIN
Funnily enough, I thought Chastain's performance on the show was kind of awful. She plays a pregnant girl who lives in Veronica's apartment complex, who it turns out, was raped by her stepfather. She only appears in one episode, never to be seen again, but I just like the idea of including an Oscar nominee in the list!
Tuesday, March 12, 2013
Oz Comic-Con Smallville Dinner
My friend Adam bought me an Oz Comic-Con special event ticket for my birthday. Basically, there's a plethora of dinners you can choose from, attended by one or two genre stars. He wisely let me decide which dinner he'd gift (because I'm fickle) and read me the list of actors (from various tv shows) scheduled for each event.
At one point I yelled "Stop! Did you say just say Aaron Ashmore??" He confirmed AA would indeed be at the Smallville dinner, before starting to read down the list again. I cut him off with, "No, that's enough- I'll go to that one!"
At one point I yelled "Stop! Did you say just say Aaron Ashmore??" He confirmed AA would indeed be at the Smallville dinner, before starting to read down the list again. I cut him off with, "No, that's enough- I'll go to that one!"
I'm a longterm fan of the Ashmore brothers. I like them for a lot of reasons, including the fact twins fascinate me. Most of the stories I've written have a set of twins in them. (I could go on about why I find the concepts of twins endlessly interesting- but I'll refrain.)
Twins who also happen to be actors? That's a whole other level of interesting. Separately, I enjoy/appreciate the Ashmores' performances (though Aaron more so). Weird fact: For quite a few years I thought they were one actor, and was slightly puzzled at odd differences in the looks and gestures between each of Aar-awn's performances. (Yes, explained by the fact I was actually watching two completely different people in various separate roles- and morphing them!)
Originally, I loved Aaron Ashmore in the tv show Veronica Mars, portraying the charming but dastardly Troy. I also thought he was great in Smallville as the earnest Jimmy Olsen. Lately he's popped up in Lost Girl and Warehouse 13, both shows I watch, and been fantastic in each (playing extremely different personalities), so I was more than happy to eat dinner at the same table as him.
Onscreen, both Ashmore brothers have what my mother calls "speaking" eyes; the kind that emote, making them perfect for television and cinema. Secondly, they have an almost impeccable sense of timing, in terms of performance. I'm not sure if that's instinctive, or learned, but somehow they always work a scene to borderline perfection.
When Aaron Ashmore appears onscreen, you really do believe he's a spoilt rich boy conning Veronica/photojournalist who married Chloe/musician in love with Kenzi/gay Warehouse agent partnered to Claudia, and so forth... by which I mean, his performances are alway understated, yet strikingly realistic. (It's also interesting to note he's often cast in roles that see him paired with multi-faceted female characters). He never overpowers his co-stars, making no attempt to dominate ensemble scenes (a professional show of restraint too often underrated). Somehow, he consistently projects a certain authenticity, as if the character he is playing really is someone you might meet on the street.
My goal is to write for television, so I watch and study television the way Tarantino studied film... Noting popular narrative arcs, the power of ensemble casts, discrepancies in editing and pacing, preferred narrative templates for various networks and demographics (God save us all from television's dependency on procedurals). I process the structure for myriad reasons, ie to understand why some shows are successful, to pinpoint when popular programs jump the shark- and so on. I devour all the behind the scene information I can find. This way, when I do get my break, I'm pretty much as informed as I could possibly be without actually working on a set (& dare I say, possibly more informed than some with experience under their belt).
The idea of chatting with someone who had worked on various shows I admired, for whom television production is how they make their living (and who is notably good at it)… well, that was definitely something I wasn't going to pass up! Insider info over a meal sounded like a divine birthday present.
Off I went to the Smallville dinner. I was slightly nervous someone would start quizzing me on arrival and I'd be ejected for not being a "real" Smallville fan (yes, these are the things I worry about). I'll admit I even read ScifiNow magazine's Complete Guide To Smallville feature the night before the event, LOL.
The email notification specified the dress code was smart casual, which made me wonder if this was to subtly dissuade costuming? (Or maybe I was reading too much into it?). Either way, I left my Peter Alexander superhero nightie in the wardrobe HAHA and went for an all-black ensemble with a Great Gatsby original cover print bag.
Note: There's always time for literary pretension in the form of a book-based fashion accessory, especially if said novel is currently experiencing a resurgence in popular culture. (Thanks Baz.)
The email notification specified the dress code was smart casual, which made me wonder if this was to subtly dissuade costuming? (Or maybe I was reading too much into it?). Either way, I left my Peter Alexander superhero nightie in the wardrobe HAHA and went for an all-black ensemble with a Great Gatsby original cover print bag.
Note: There's always time for literary pretension in the form of a book-based fashion accessory, especially if said novel is currently experiencing a resurgence in popular culture. (Thanks Baz.)
The most surreal moment of the evening took place upon arrival. The dinner events were on the first floor of the hotel, but since they weren't finished preparing the rooms, we were told to wait in the foyer. A few couches were arranged in a circular pattern, with a couple of dozen people waiting (if not more). I sat down next to two teenagers, then realised, hey, wait a minute… some of these people look HIGHLY FAMILIAR.
Basically, the stars from Oz Comic-Con booked to attend the dinners were also waiting in the foyer and appeared to be in no hurry to get upstairs and segregate themselves from their fans (serious kudos for that). It was bizarre, though, to be surrounded by cast members from so many popular genre shows!
To set the scene: Aaron Ashmore and Patricia Quinn (Rocky Horror Picture Show) were chatting nearby. A guy who looked vaguely familiar waved, & it took me a second to realise it was Eddie McClintock, and he looked familiar because I'd been watching Warehouse 13 on Foxtel that morning!
Glancing around, I noticed some Star Trek alumni mingling, and was trying to take all this in when Jason Momoa from Game of Thrones and Stargate Atlantis rocked up and started high five-ing people... at which point my brain literally short-circuited. (The list of stars goes on, but I'll stop here so no one dies of envy.)
Glancing around, I noticed some Star Trek alumni mingling, and was trying to take all this in when Jason Momoa from Game of Thrones and Stargate Atlantis rocked up and started high five-ing people... at which point my brain literally short-circuited. (The list of stars goes on, but I'll stop here so no one dies of envy.)
We finally went upstairs, trudging into the elevators en masse. I think it's fair to say you couldn't have found a friendlier, chattier group of Comic-Con celebrities. Major props to whoever selected the easygoing crew (visiting Perth in Australia, in case I hadn't mentioned).
Dinner was nice, although sitting with people you don't know is always kind of weird. (I guess it's weirder for the actors, although the paycheck probably helps!). A little like being at a wedding, except everyone was wayyyy more excited to be there- and we actually wanted to hear some speeches.
Aaron Ashmore proved to be as charming and intelligent as the organisers (and diners) could have hoped for, with a lot of interesting and insightful things to say about his career and place/s of work (ie the sets of small screen productions). He even took extremely predictable questions seriously and refrained from the eye rolling I would have probably indulged in, LOL.
I mentioned that I'd heard the set of Lost Girl it was in a warehouse, with small corridors between each "location", and he added that the corridors have green screens at the end, to make it appear that they go on for miles… basically he was full of these sorts of tidbits which (of course) I soaked up like a sponge. He laughed when we all pointed out that extras in Canadian shows seem to pop up repeatedly, over seasons and across many a' show. When talked turned to movies, he admitted he can't stand people who talk in cinemas, to the point where he'll tell them to can it… which led to a pros and con round-up of Cabin In The Woods, randomly enough. (AA was pro, btw).
When someone asked if there were any difficult people among the casts of the shows he's worked on, I like the way he tried to explain that the set of a tv show isn't really a place where actors can throw tantrums. He said that some actors may have what he would call big personalities, but that's a different thing. From what he was trying to articulate, I got the impression television productions are primarily a business, and that to stay employed on a set, people have to work hard, that the tv community in Canada is quite small, and you basically need to have a good professional reputation to continue to even hope to gain employment- like any workplace, really.
On the Smallville front, someone mentioned the fact his brother Shaun also appeared on the show and he said he'd been surprised to be considered for a role after that- but it hadn't appeared to bother them at all. He admitted he'd been waiting for a sly reference to Shaun's character Eric (and their startling physical similarity perhaps?) to show up in the script- but surprisingly, it never did.
On the Smallville front, someone mentioned the fact his brother Shaun also appeared on the show and he said he'd been surprised to be considered for a role after that- but it hadn't appeared to bother them at all. He admitted he'd been waiting for a sly reference to Shaun's character Eric (and their startling physical similarity perhaps?) to show up in the script- but surprisingly, it never did.
Overall, just awesome dinner conversation with a soft spoken, polite and interesting special guest! Definitely worth the money, and I completely urge anyone who loves Oz Comic-Con to save the cash and go to a special event next year. They're basically a much more informal meet 'n greet, with some lovely grub thrown in the mix...
...Speaking of eating (or not), the funniest moment was when the waitress put my main course down just as someone realised she'd missed Aaron. Flustered, she grabbed my plate and whisked it away to give to him, pretty much the exact second I was about to eat from it. That provided a few laughs for the table. (Later, I pointed out to him it was pretty clear which one of us was the celebrity in this scenario.)*
(*I feel I should mention Callum Blue was also at the Smallville dinner- but since I don't really know him from any shows, I can't say much aside from the fact he was sassy, cheerful, and bought the entire table a round of drinks).
By the by, everyone working for Oz Comic-Con was polite and helpful. A great relief, considering someone else bought my ticket for this name-on-the-door event and I had to rock up kind of hoping for the (organisational) best.
After dessert, both stars were told the event had officially finished, so they were free to leave, but of course, welcome to stay. They chose to stay. Interestingly, none of the stars from any of the other meals seemed to be bolting for the exit, either.
I left feeling inspired and determined. It was fantastic to be around people who work in scripted television- to feel that for some, your dream is an everyday reality. It made me realise entering the industry is not so much about making a wild leap, as it is about about taking well planned steps to render your goal achievable.
Undoubtedly a brilliant birthday present. Sure, I enjoyed meeting the celebrities, but the impression that working on a narrative-based television show is a job I'm just as capable of doing as the next (creative) person, was the truly priceless gift.
Undoubtedly a brilliant birthday present. Sure, I enjoyed meeting the celebrities, but the impression that working on a narrative-based television show is a job I'm just as capable of doing as the next (creative) person, was the truly priceless gift.
Monday, January 7, 2013
Lucky Dip aka Something For Everyone
'Tis the season! No, not Christmas, the one after that... when new scripted television shows hit our screens and we cross our fingers for a fresh find, always hoping for a brand new cult series just over the horizon, something wildly entertaining and ever-so-addictive.
What's It About? Francis Underwood is going to be President, but first, it's going to get ugly. (Well, that's the tagline I would have run with.) Even his own party have Underestimated Underwood's ambition (see what I did there?). Cue multi-layered political machinations.
Why Watch It? Because it's an adaptation of a BBC miniseries. And let's face it, the road to the White House really does provide endless story fodder.
Who's In It? Kevin Spacey, who rarely puts in anything but an Oscar-level performance. Robin Wright also appears. Definitely one to check out.
Here's a dozen contenders to kick off the year:
1.Banshee
What's It About? An ex-con who poses as a murdered sheriff. Apparently includes kick-ass martial arts and violence (sorry, the PC term is, 'action sequences'). Sadly, no mention of actual banshees.
Why Watch It? Because Banshee is the new show from Alan Ball, creator of True Blood and Six Feet Under (not a bad track record!).
What Else? The promotional poster made me think the show was animated. Trying for the look of a pulp novel cover, perhaps?
2. Cult
What's It About? You had to ask, didn't you? It's a tv show about people who watch a tv show. The tv show is about a cult, but I think the fans become a bit of a cult? And there's missing people. Or something. (Hey, there's a lot of cutaways in the trailer!)
Why Watch It? For the conspiracies and the Big Brother aspect (by which I mean grim Orwellian-style cleverness and not reality tv bastardisation of the concept).
Who's in it? Matthew Davis, who played Alaric in The Vampire Diaries, and Alona Tal, who played Meg in Veronica Mars and Jo in Supernatural. Two actors that I love, so I'm in.
3. Zero Hour
What's It About? A guy whose wife is kidnapped after she buys a timepiece that gets them tangled in a Da Vinci Code/National Treasure-style conspiracy. Expect more metaphors/puns/play on words involving the concept of time than any one show should ever indulge in.
Why Watch It? Not for the dialogue, if the trailer's anything to go by. Those are some SERIOUSLY generic lines. "Some say the Nazi's stole that secret in an attempt to harness evil... return the clock to me, or she dies." Actually, the voicover's worse: "To find his wife, one man will have to unravel one of the greatest conspiracies of all time." COME ON. But let's be honest, most of us are suckers for a treasure hunting/save the world tale.
Who's In It? That actor from ER with the kind face, Anthony Edwards (also from Northern Exposure back in the day) and Jacinda Barrett, one of my favourite Australian actresses.
4. The Following
What's It About? An (ex) Federal Agent finds out the serial killer he helped put away has a cult-like following of fellow serial killers spread across the United States. One thing's for sure, with this premise, they're not going to run out of storyline options anytime soon.
Why Watch It? I'd say the network's attempting to tap into the Dexter market, albeit with a slightly different angle. A very dark, intelligent procedural, which I'm guessing will appeal to a large audience.
Who's In It? Kevin Bacon and James Purefoy, both very talented. There's also an Ashmore brother in the mix (Shawn this time around, aka Iceman in the X-Men movies). I am so there!
Why Watch It? I'd say the network's attempting to tap into the Dexter market, albeit with a slightly different angle. A very dark, intelligent procedural, which I'm guessing will appeal to a large audience.
Who's In It? Kevin Bacon and James Purefoy, both very talented. There's also an Ashmore brother in the mix (Shawn this time around, aka Iceman in the X-Men movies). I am so there!
5. The Americans
What's It About? A normal American family during the Reagan's reign, who just happen to be Russian spies. Attempting to entertain American audiences by forcing them to empathise with undercover Russian operatives during the Cold War era is an interesting idea, but will it work?
Why Watch It? For the sleeper spies, a concept I have always found utterly fascinating, especially if the faux couple have children. The creator of the show is a former member of the CIA, so I'm expecting authenticity.
What else? I think Keri Russell (yes, Felicity) will surprise everyone with the calibre of her performance.
6. Red Widow
What's It About? A woman whose husband is killed as a result of his links with organised crime must handle the aftermath to ensure her children's safety. Rhada Mitchell stars. (So many Aussie's in US tv shows right now.)
Why Watch It? Because Melissa Rosenberg is the creator, and she was the head writer on Dexter for the first few years. The lady sure knows how to tell a story (putting aside the Twilight film adaptations).
What Else? There's a bit of a Good Wife vibe here, in the sense that a homemaker has to step up to the plate and deal with the fallout of her husband's shady actions.
7. Ripper Street
What's It About? Basically a cop show set in the East End during the Jack the Ripper period. (Yes, same music as used in The Great Gatsby trailer, but I don't blame them for the double-up, this track excels at creating atmosphere.)
Why Watch It? Because the BBC so often delivers. I don't like gory procedurals, but I do appreciate quality costuming, clever sets, strong cinematography, intelligent narrative and brilliant performances, all of which the BBC demands from its talent. I can see this making money for the network globally.
Who's In It? Matthew Macfadyen, who has one gorgeous voice to go with those startling blue eyes.
Why Watch It? Because the BBC so often delivers. I don't like gory procedurals, but I do appreciate quality costuming, clever sets, strong cinematography, intelligent narrative and brilliant performances, all of which the BBC demands from its talent. I can see this making money for the network globally.
Who's In It? Matthew Macfadyen, who has one gorgeous voice to go with those startling blue eyes.
8. The Carrie Diaries
What's It About? The teenage years of Carrie (yes, THAT Sex and the City character). After her mum passes away, as a way to help her deal with the tragedy, her dad secures Carrie an internship in Manhattan. Expect high school adventures with a dash of inner city cool.
Why Watch It? Because there has to be one lighthearted teen soap on the viewing schedule, for days when you've already used up your thinking quota.
What Else? The show is from the CW network, who needed something to replace Gossip Girl. The series is set in the eighties, so expect a lot of bold fashion and hair, which would look wild and crazy if there wasn't so much pseudo-eighties neon around right now...!
9. Deception
What's It About? A woman returns to the wealthy family she grew up with, working undercover to investigate the murder of the heiress daughter. Think glamour, sex, secrets, and cruel rich people. General soapie-esque staples, really.
Why Watch It? Because while Brits have murder mysteries set in aristocratic country houses, nowadays Yanks are all about murder mysteries in upper echelon families, the kind who own holiday homes in the Hamptons. Instead of "Miss Scarlett in the library with a candlestick", think more "Blake in the poolhouse with daddy's revolver."
What Else? Stylistically, the trailer tries to draw parallels between Deception and Revenge, which makes sense, considering the ratings Revenge pulls in.
Why Watch It? Because while Brits have murder mysteries set in aristocratic country houses, nowadays Yanks are all about murder mysteries in upper echelon families, the kind who own holiday homes in the Hamptons. Instead of "Miss Scarlett in the library with a candlestick", think more "Blake in the poolhouse with daddy's revolver."
What Else? Stylistically, the trailer tries to draw parallels between Deception and Revenge, which makes sense, considering the ratings Revenge pulls in.
10. Do No Harm
What's It About? A successful neurosurgeon is forced to deal with his alter-ego, a reckless individual (apparently) hell bent on ruining his life. The show's being sold as a modern day take on Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.
Why Watch It? Alternate personalities makes for entertaining fare, but the material needs to be handled with care. The quality of the writing and acting is key here, so only time will tell if this show works.
What Else? There's not much to say about this yet. It doesn't boast any standout talent I'm familiar with, and so far, there doesn't appear to be a lot of hype. Even though this is technically a medical drama (a genre that usually enjoys a certain longevity), I'd be surprised if it lasts past the original twelve episode order.
Why Watch It? Alternate personalities makes for entertaining fare, but the material needs to be handled with care. The quality of the writing and acting is key here, so only time will tell if this show works.
What Else? There's not much to say about this yet. It doesn't boast any standout talent I'm familiar with, and so far, there doesn't appear to be a lot of hype. Even though this is technically a medical drama (a genre that usually enjoys a certain longevity), I'd be surprised if it lasts past the original twelve episode order.
11. Defiance
What's It About? Aliens who need somewhere new to live feel compelled to invade after the citizens of Earth prove less than accommodating (shocker). The planet gets accidentally (kind of) terraformed during the war. The show follows the trials and tribulations of life in a now less-than-friendly environment and a post-war mixed species society.
Why Watch It? Because the concept is challenging and could make for interesting television, if the writing is equal to the premise.
What Else? This doesn't hit screens till April, but I thought it was worth a mention because, hello, new scifi. Let's just hope the scripts are sharper than the first season of Falling Skies...
Why Watch It? Because the concept is challenging and could make for interesting television, if the writing is equal to the premise.
What Else? This doesn't hit screens till April, but I thought it was worth a mention because, hello, new scifi. Let's just hope the scripts are sharper than the first season of Falling Skies...
12. House of Cards
What's It About? Francis Underwood is going to be President, but first, it's going to get ugly. (Well, that's the tagline I would have run with.) Even his own party have Underestimated Underwood's ambition (see what I did there?). Cue multi-layered political machinations.
Why Watch It? Because it's an adaptation of a BBC miniseries. And let's face it, the road to the White House really does provide endless story fodder.
Who's In It? Kevin Spacey, who rarely puts in anything but an Oscar-level performance. Robin Wright also appears. Definitely one to check out.
Monday, December 31, 2012
2012: A CW Odyssey
When it comes to blogging on the last day of the year, most of us lean toward one of two options. Either evaluating the past year and alternating between ranting and raving, or focusing on the year to come by engaging in a whole lotta speculation.
Today, I felt like I was in the mood for a (scripted tv) round-up. So, what to write about?
Cue a blog draft lamenting the downfall of Last Resort and the formal pass on Mockingbird Lane, which are the two standout television losses of 2012, to my mind.
Then it struck me... I don't feel like writing all el serious-o. It's New Years Eve. My heart is light (or something like that).
Instead, I want to go girly. Talk about the times throughout the year that tv shows made me jump up and down and clap like I'm at a Bring It On audition (yes, I am that lame). The kind of shows I like to watch after a hard day's work, when I don't have the energy to figure out a Poirot mystery (yes, it's true, I heart the Inspector).
Don't get me wrong, I appreciate complex scripts, love science fiction, adore formats that challenge viewers, and a number of the programs below do offer some of these elements, to a certain degree... but another part of me also likes particular tv shows just because they're charming, sweet, even a litt-le bit silly.
Deciding to take it to the next (girly-girl) level, I've focused solely on CW shows, because let's face it, I do enjoy the network's offerings. They make up a decided chunk of my viewing schedule. Some are darker in tone and deal with more complex themes, while others are light and frothy, like the tv version of a guilty pleasure.
In summary, this year's final blog is a tribute to half a dozen notable moments (in no particular order) that the CW entertained me with this year. Some people will agree, others will be horrified, and many will secretly agree while pretending to be horrified.
But hey, I'm pretty happy to own my own tastes. C'est la vie, right?
It's true, there were actual tears. (Hey, noone was as surprised as I was!) Admittedly, Gossip Girl went completely off the rails for a while there, to the point where even I couldn't make it through an episode, but the last season reclaimed a little of the iconic show's original sparkle.
There's something so gentle about it. The characters are kind, community-minded, and more often than not, so very romantically confused. There are constant love triangles on this show, to the point where the characters move from one triangle to another. (In a kind of respectably kooky way, might I add.)
The setting itself qualifies as another character. The South is so beautiful! (Well, on tv anyway. Maybe it's the imaginary South I want to visit one day?) Bluebell's eccentric citizens remind me a little of the oddballs on Gilmore Girls back in the day, or even Northern Exposure's quirky crew.
Let's face it, Rachel Bilson is great. Who didn't love Seth and Summer in the OC? She's just as fun in Hart of Dixie.
It actually surprises me how much I love this superhero show.
I was never a huge Smallville fan. The program had a specific tone that was sometimes too melodramatic for me. When I did watch it, I often enjoyed it (partly because I could see how much effort went into each episode), but I never went out of my way to catch it every week. And while there were aspects of the show I really appreciated, others aggravated me no end.
Enter Arrow as the network's superhero replacement. Somehow, this show struck the BULLSEYE of my viewing preferences. (Sorry, couldn't resist.)
I think it's partly the lack of jarring slapstick humour that seems to creep into a lot of superhero offerings (a format truly mastered by superhero maestro Joss Whedon, but not always pulled off by everyone else). In contrast, this program plays it straight (as an arrow! I gotta stop this).
Our main guy, Oliver McQueen, is brutal... and I love it. I love the dark aesthetic, and the way the narrative structure draws parallels between our protagonist's experiences on the island, and his present day experiences back in (so-called) civilisation.
I could go on, but I think I'll save the Arrow love for it's own blog in 2013.
Yes, I watch The Vampire Diaries.
I take my hat off to the scriptwriting team. They have dozens of subplots on the go at any time, many often left static till a later point in the season, when re-introducing a particular conflict or character has the most shocking and unforeseen impact. Kudos for a fine display of narrative juggling.
Probably the most erratic aspect of the program is the varying levels of acting talent. Aside from above-par scripts, the series basically survives on quality guest stars and the charismatic skills of Ian Somerhalder and Candice Accola, who carry less impressive leads Nina Dobrev and Paul Wesley.
The only flaw I would point out this season, is the continuation of a of determined naivety from certain characters (here's looking at you Bonny) that helps plotlines along, but is slightly less believable as the years go by. (For example, the fact anyone ever had a conversation with creepy Professor Shane to begin with, beggars belief...!)
Today, I felt like I was in the mood for a (scripted tv) round-up. So, what to write about?
Cue a blog draft lamenting the downfall of Last Resort and the formal pass on Mockingbird Lane, which are the two standout television losses of 2012, to my mind.
Then it struck me... I don't feel like writing all el serious-o. It's New Years Eve. My heart is light (or something like that).
Instead, I want to go girly. Talk about the times throughout the year that tv shows made me jump up and down and clap like I'm at a Bring It On audition (yes, I am that lame). The kind of shows I like to watch after a hard day's work, when I don't have the energy to figure out a Poirot mystery (yes, it's true, I heart the Inspector).
Don't get me wrong, I appreciate complex scripts, love science fiction, adore formats that challenge viewers, and a number of the programs below do offer some of these elements, to a certain degree... but another part of me also likes particular tv shows just because they're charming, sweet, even a litt-le bit silly.
Deciding to take it to the next (girly-girl) level, I've focused solely on CW shows, because let's face it, I do enjoy the network's offerings. They make up a decided chunk of my viewing schedule. Some are darker in tone and deal with more complex themes, while others are light and frothy, like the tv version of a guilty pleasure.
In summary, this year's final blog is a tribute to half a dozen notable moments (in no particular order) that the CW entertained me with this year. Some people will agree, others will be horrified, and many will secretly agree while pretending to be horrified.
But hey, I'm pretty happy to own my own tastes. C'est la vie, right?
1. Gossip Girl Ended Forever and I Cried.
It's true, there were actual tears. (Hey, noone was as surprised as I was!) Admittedly, Gossip Girl went completely off the rails for a while there, to the point where even I couldn't make it through an episode, but the last season reclaimed a little of the iconic show's original sparkle.
I admired the fashion, the interiors were always fabulous, the nod to modern contemporary art was admirable, and frankly, Blair and Chuck were my FAVOURITE tv couple.
The early days of the series were notable because Gossip Girl was one of the first shows to utilise mobile phones and internet access as a positive narrative tool, rather than viewing technology as something that hampered the standard scripted television procedures and formats established for decades.
And I am one of those people who loved the final Gossip Girl identity reveal... it was a lovely nod to The Great Gatsby.
2. Hart of Dixie Won Me Over.
I fell in love with Hart of Dixie, in all its occasionally caricatured Southern awfulness/awesomeness, because the show has an odd kind of charm.There's something so gentle about it. The characters are kind, community-minded, and more often than not, so very romantically confused. There are constant love triangles on this show, to the point where the characters move from one triangle to another. (In a kind of respectably kooky way, might I add.)
The setting itself qualifies as another character. The South is so beautiful! (Well, on tv anyway. Maybe it's the imaginary South I want to visit one day?) Bluebell's eccentric citizens remind me a little of the oddballs on Gilmore Girls back in the day, or even Northern Exposure's quirky crew.
Let's face it, Rachel Bilson is great. Who didn't love Seth and Summer in the OC? She's just as fun in Hart of Dixie.
3. Arrow is the New Cool Kid At School.
It actually surprises me how much I love this superhero show.
I was never a huge Smallville fan. The program had a specific tone that was sometimes too melodramatic for me. When I did watch it, I often enjoyed it (partly because I could see how much effort went into each episode), but I never went out of my way to catch it every week. And while there were aspects of the show I really appreciated, others aggravated me no end.
Enter Arrow as the network's superhero replacement. Somehow, this show struck the BULLSEYE of my viewing preferences. (Sorry, couldn't resist.)
I think it's partly the lack of jarring slapstick humour that seems to creep into a lot of superhero offerings (a format truly mastered by superhero maestro Joss Whedon, but not always pulled off by everyone else). In contrast, this program plays it straight (as an arrow! I gotta stop this).
Our main guy, Oliver McQueen, is brutal... and I love it. I love the dark aesthetic, and the way the narrative structure draws parallels between our protagonist's experiences on the island, and his present day experiences back in (so-called) civilisation.
I could go on, but I think I'll save the Arrow love for it's own blog in 2013.
4. Supernatural, The Show With a Never-Ending Afterlife.
I would have to say, in recent years, Supernatural has offered some of the best television writing I've ever seen... and some of the worst. Yes, the script has gone from heavenly heights of awesomeness to hell depths of awfulness (kind of like this pun).
For a show to span such a broad spectrum, in terms of quality, while consistently managing to avoid cancellation... well, that's an achievement in itself. The most recent season appears to be more of a return to form, though some still claim the series jumped the shark long ago.
Just knowing Sam and Dean are still on the air is somehow reassuring. I like the Winchester brothers. I love the way they struggle on. In the eternal battle of good versus evil, these two are epic in their dogged persistence, like re-imagined heroes of old. AND, just like certain heroes of old, they have one of the most complex sibling relationships (television has) ever seen.
They also helped usher in the era of popularised supernatural-themed fiction, television and film. Sure, the vamp craze get a lot of the credit, but seeing Dean and Sam in mainstream press certainly helped inch open a few doors.
For anyone who's wondering if I'm Team Dean or Team Sam.... the answer is, Team Castiel. That's one smokin' Fallen Angel. (Now I'm not even sure if I'm punning. That's how far I am over the line.)
I would have to say, in recent years, Supernatural has offered some of the best television writing I've ever seen... and some of the worst. Yes, the script has gone from heavenly heights of awesomeness to hell depths of awfulness (kind of like this pun).
For a show to span such a broad spectrum, in terms of quality, while consistently managing to avoid cancellation... well, that's an achievement in itself. The most recent season appears to be more of a return to form, though some still claim the series jumped the shark long ago.
Just knowing Sam and Dean are still on the air is somehow reassuring. I like the Winchester brothers. I love the way they struggle on. In the eternal battle of good versus evil, these two are epic in their dogged persistence, like re-imagined heroes of old. AND, just like certain heroes of old, they have one of the most complex sibling relationships (television has) ever seen.
They also helped usher in the era of popularised supernatural-themed fiction, television and film. Sure, the vamp craze get a lot of the credit, but seeing Dean and Sam in mainstream press certainly helped inch open a few doors.
For anyone who's wondering if I'm Team Dean or Team Sam.... the answer is, Team Castiel. That's one smokin' Fallen Angel. (Now I'm not even sure if I'm punning. That's how far I am over the line.)
5. Damon and Elena Finally Hook Up (or more accurately, Stefan and Elena Really Break Up).
Yes, I watch The Vampire Diaries.
I take my hat off to the scriptwriting team. They have dozens of subplots on the go at any time, many often left static till a later point in the season, when re-introducing a particular conflict or character has the most shocking and unforeseen impact. Kudos for a fine display of narrative juggling.
Probably the most erratic aspect of the program is the varying levels of acting talent. Aside from above-par scripts, the series basically survives on quality guest stars and the charismatic skills of Ian Somerhalder and Candice Accola, who carry less impressive leads Nina Dobrev and Paul Wesley.
The only flaw I would point out this season, is the continuation of a of determined naivety from certain characters (here's looking at you Bonny) that helps plotlines along, but is slightly less believable as the years go by. (For example, the fact anyone ever had a conversation with creepy Professor Shane to begin with, beggars belief...!)
6. Beauty And The Beast Austen'd Me.
I know, judge away.
This show is pretty terrible. I'm not denying it. The procedural aspect is GOD AWFUL, and I kind of wish the creators would realise it's borderline irrelevant/unnecessary, and shift their primary focus to character interactions.
Some of the support cast are appalling. Any connection to the original concept is so negligible that using the same name is a total marketing fail. (Did the network learn nothing from the 90210 fiasco?!).
Frankly, there are so many things to complain about. AND YET...
I would never miss an episode, because Katherine and Vincent's emotional entanglement makes for heart-wrenching, old-fashioned, pure, unadulterated romance. It's endearingly sweet.
Actors Kristin Kreuk and Jay Ryan heat up the small screen with more chemistry than I've seen in a long while (hampered by less touching than a Georgette Heyer novel, mind you).
While the screenwriters managed to get everything else about the show wrong, when it came to developing and exploring the integral connection between the two leads, they (accidentally?) excelled. (Or maybe I should give them the benefit of the doubt here?)
The backstories help this tortured coupling work. He's lost a brother and lives in a horrific situation. She saw her mother murdered and hence has more issues than most. Two damaged characters, who as a result of their traumas, feel compelled to help other people.
I think it's this aspect that hooked me in. I also like that despite being the mutual attraction, they're so bad at connecting with other people that it makes for an inevitably rocky (and therefore interesting) road to romance.
Basically, I'm happy to hang in there and hope the show can avoid cancellation long enough to figure out a stronger narrative direction, and learn to work with its strengths, because Kreuk and Ryan deserve the chance to make this show work.
This show is pretty terrible. I'm not denying it. The procedural aspect is GOD AWFUL, and I kind of wish the creators would realise it's borderline irrelevant/unnecessary, and shift their primary focus to character interactions.
Some of the support cast are appalling. Any connection to the original concept is so negligible that using the same name is a total marketing fail. (Did the network learn nothing from the 90210 fiasco?!).
Frankly, there are so many things to complain about. AND YET...
I would never miss an episode, because Katherine and Vincent's emotional entanglement makes for heart-wrenching, old-fashioned, pure, unadulterated romance. It's endearingly sweet.
Actors Kristin Kreuk and Jay Ryan heat up the small screen with more chemistry than I've seen in a long while (hampered by less touching than a Georgette Heyer novel, mind you).
While the screenwriters managed to get everything else about the show wrong, when it came to developing and exploring the integral connection between the two leads, they (accidentally?) excelled. (Or maybe I should give them the benefit of the doubt here?)
The backstories help this tortured coupling work. He's lost a brother and lives in a horrific situation. She saw her mother murdered and hence has more issues than most. Two damaged characters, who as a result of their traumas, feel compelled to help other people.
I think it's this aspect that hooked me in. I also like that despite being the mutual attraction, they're so bad at connecting with other people that it makes for an inevitably rocky (and therefore interesting) road to romance.
Basically, I'm happy to hang in there and hope the show can avoid cancellation long enough to figure out a stronger narrative direction, and learn to work with its strengths, because Kreuk and Ryan deserve the chance to make this show work.
HONOURABLE MENTION/TOO COOL FOR SCHOOL MOMENT OF 2012:
The actor who played Logan Echolls on Veronica Mars, the inimitable Jason Dohring, had a daughter this year, who he and his wife named Lilly (yes, same spelling as the show). Now that's Meta!
Happy New Year x
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)