Scripted television is in the process
of adapting to survive an ever changing entertainment arena. The gap between the viewer and the product is
shrinking, and to remain financially viable television needs to keep audiences
engaged. But how?
Social
media is in a sense a blessing and a curse for “traditional” TV shows. On the
positive front, various platforms allow a new level of audience engagement
(more on that later).
On
the other hand, a penchant for live videos has made many viewers watch fewer scripted
shows, clicking on videos instead. Vlogger numbers are showing people,
especially the younger demographic, love the immediacy of platforms like
YouTube and Instagram—meaning social media has become both supporter, and competitor.
Social
media allows audiences to become emotionally engaged with characters,
storylines, actors, or all of the above: think fans, stans, and ships. (FYI shipping means wanting characters in a romantic
relationship.)
If a
story arc takes an unpopular turn or a ship is “sunk” (ie characters are romantically
matched with other people) the ratings backlash can be vicious. Audiences today
are emotionally involved, as well as feeling more entitled in terms of having
an impact on storylines.
Much
of scripted television is pre-produced so adjusting the plot (before the next
season) is problematic. More TV shows are taking feedback into account and
adjusting scripts while in production: not so much major plots, but subplots,
character popularity, and subsequent allocation of screentime.
This
is called fan service and (obviously) the industry has a mixed view of the
process, as it means relinquishing some control of the script direction. In
reality, taking audience reactions into account makes sense; just a subplot
change can mean the difference between cancellation and renewal, especially as
many networks no longer allow time for a show to find its feet.
Some
web series’ have experimented with interactive viewing, a little like Choose
Your Own Adventure books of the past. The idea is to shoot the next episode
with plot changes based on feedback (similar in a way to reality shows and
their “voting” systems). Perhaps this is worth considering, even if it requires
changes to the current standard production model?
Likewise,
the ever-growing popularity of fan fiction has shown people love offshoot
stories and often can’t get enough of a particular (and sometimes minor)
character. Rather than creating entire shows—spin-offs are risky business—why
not follow the short form path of fan fiction, and produce a series of
specials, whether one episode, or five, concentrating on these characters? The
current TV format doesn’t fully utilise cast popularity. (I know this is done
with webisodes, but the drop in production quality is the problem: people need
to see the same style of shooting/editing that they see in the original
series.)
A
recent trend is dropping full seasons of a show for “binge” watching. This draws
large numbers in the initial period, but ongoing engagement is lost. Shows that
release one episode a week benefit from bloggers and recappers who are likely
to cover a season of a binge show in a single post.
Yes,
audiences desire immediacy, but they also have short attention spans, so
without constant reminders of a series, interest can plummet. I wonder if
statistically the second season of a show dropped en bulke performs as well as the
second season of a weekly series?
Another
relevant aspect is, of course, profit, and the integration of marketing. Advertising
is a necessary source of income, and with the “commercial break” becoming less
tolerated, those streaming scripted TV shows have had to become cleverer when
it comes to pushing merchandise.
Product
placement is a classic advertising option. In the past it had to be subtle, but
in today’s tech-savvy market, social media celebrities push products as they
don’t have a network structure to rely on advertorially, meaning the younger
demographic likely find promotion less offensive.
What
if instead of inserting commercials, or trying to work a few products into the
scenes of scripted TV shows, most of the props and costuming were available to
purchase? Consider a streaming platform that included links for viewers: if a dress, a
chair, or a lipgloss appealed, the viewer could swipe, and have a purchase
window/link pop open. Wouldn’t that be a less invasive form of advertising,
since these elements have to appear anyway?
No comments:
Post a Comment